MICHEL FOUCAULT AND THE MATRYOSHKA – THE RUSSIAN DOLL EFFECT
Corresponding author:
[email protected]
Accepted
27 March 2026
Available Online
15 March 2015
Keywords
MICHEL FOUCAULT
POSTSTRUCTURALISM
POSTMODERNITY
MODERNITY
Full Text
The body of this article is intentionally hidden on the public page. Please use the PDF reader or the PDF download for the complete text.
References
[1]
Borbély, Ștefan. 2006. 1968 - Year of the agitated sun and its media reflections in Romania . Observator Cultural, 302-303.
[2]
Călinescu, Matei . 1995. Five Faces of Modernity : Modernism, Avant -Garde, Decadence, Kitsch, Postmodernism. Bucharest: Univers.
[3]
Foucault, Michel. 1982. This is Not a Pipe. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1982.
[4]
Foucault, Michel. 1994. Dits et écrits, vol. IV. Paris: Gallimard.
[5]
Grigorescu, Dan. 1994. From Hemlock to Coca- Cola. Bucharest: Minerva Publishing House.
[6]
Habermas, Jürgen. 1984. The French Path to Postmodernity: Bataille between Eroticism and General Economics. New German Critique, autumn, 33: 79-102.
[7]
Habermas, Jürgen. 1985. Questions and Counterquestions, in Habermas on Modernity, edited by R. Bernstein. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 196-229.
[8]
Honneth, Axel. 1991. The Critique of Power: Reflective Stages in a Critical Social Theory. Cambridge Mass.: The MIT Press.
[9]
Kramer, Hilton. 2006. The Triumph of Modernism: The Art World, 1985-2005. Chicago: Ivan R. Dee.
[10]
Petrescu, Liviu. 2011. A Poetics of Postmodernism, second edition. Pitești: Paralela 45 Publishing House.
[11]
Sloterdijk, Peter. 2000. Critique of Cynical Reason (vol.1). Iassy: Polirom Publishing House.
[12]
”Secolul 20” Magazine, edited by the Writers Union from the Socialist Republic Romania, 5, 1967;
[13]
”Scînteia tineretului”, 1 June, 1968.