CLINICAL PRESENTATION, DIANGOSTIC WORKUP AND THERAPEUTIC APPROACH FOR PANCREATIC CANCER IN A TERTIARY GASTROENTEROLOGY CENTER
Corresponding author:
[email protected]
Accepted
28 March 2026
Available Online
15 March 2018
Abstract
CANCER OF THE EXOCRINE PANCREAS IS A HIGHLY LETHAL MALIGNANCY . SURGICAL RESECTION IS THE ONLY POTENTIALLY CURATIVE TREATMENT. UNFORTUNATELY, BECAUSE OF THE LATE PRESENTATION, ONLY 15 TO 20 PERCENT OF PATIENTS ARE CANDIDATES FOR PANCREATECTOMY. THE AIM OF OUR STUDY WAS TO REVIEW THE RISK FACTORS, CLINICAL PRESENTATION, DIAGNOSTIC TOOLS AND THERAPEUTIC APPROACH OF PATIENTS WITH PANCREATIC CANCER , ADMITTED TO OUR CLINIC BETWEEN JANUARY 1ST AND DECEMBER 31ST OF 2016. WE ENROLLED TWO HUNDRED AND SIXTY EIGHT CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS. WE FOUND THAT MOST PATIENTS PRESENTED AT LEAST ONE RISK FACTOR FOR PANCREATIC NEOPLASIA, ESPECIALLY CIGARETTE SMOKING AND ALCOHOL DRINKING. MANY PATIENTS WERE DIAGNOSED IN ADVANCED STAGES OF THE DISEASE, WHEN THE TUMOR WAS LOCALLY INVASIVE OR HAD DISTANT METASTASES. THE MOST FREQUENT HISTOLOGICAL TYPE WAS ADENOCARCINOMA, FOLLOWED BY NEUROENDOCRINE TUMORS (13.36%). PATIENTS BENEFITED FROM SURGICAL, ONCOLOGICAL, AND/OR ENDOSCOPIC TREATMENT. THE MEDIAN SURVIVAL TIME WAS 8.83 MONTHS FOR ADENOCARCINOMA AND 66.34 MONTHS FOR NEUROENDOCRINE TUMORS. WE NOTED A LONGER MEDIAN SURVIVAL TIME FOR ADENOCACINOMA THAN THE EUROPEAN AVERAGE OF 4.6 MONTHS, PROBABLY DUE TO THE FACT THAN PATIENTS WERE DIAGNOSED AND TREATED BY A MULTIDISCIPLINARY TEAM, IN A TERTIARY CARE FACILITY. HOWEVER WE NEED TO DO A BETTER JOB IN IDENTIFYING HIGH RISK INDIVIDUALS AND THEN OFFERING THEM A PERSONALISED SCREENI NG PROGRAM, IN ORDER TO DIAGNOSE MORE PATIENTS IN POTENTIALLY CURATIVE STAGES.
Keywords
PANCREAS
CANCER
RISK
TREATMENT
Full Text
The body of this article is intentionally hidden on the public page. Please use the PDF reader or the PDF download for the complete text.
References
[1]
Allen PJ , Kuk D , Castillo CF , Basturk O , Wolfgang CL , Cameron JL , Lillemoe KD , Ferrone CR, Morales-Oyarvide V, He J, Weiss MJ, Hruban RH, Gönen M, Klimstra DS, Mino-Kenudson M. Multi-institutional Validation Study of the American Joint Commission on Cancer (8th Edition) Changes for T and N Staging in Patients With Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg 2017; 265:185.;
[2]
Lowenfels AB, Maisonneuve P , Whitcomb DC . Risk factors for cancer in hereditary pancreatitis. International Hereditary Pancreatitis Study Group. Med Clin North Am 2000; 84:565;
[3]
Michaud DS, Liu S, Giovannucci E, Willett WC, Colditz GA, Fuchs CS. Dietary sugar, glycemic load, and pancreatic cancer risk in a prospective study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002; 94:1293;
[4]
Mujica VR, Barkin JS, Go VL . Acute pancreatitis secondary to pancreatic carcinoma. Study Gr oup Participants. Pancreas 2000; 21:329;
[5]
Bronstein YL Loyer EM , Kaur H , Choi H , David C , DuBrow RA , Broemeling LD , Cleary KR, Charnsangavej C . Detection of small pancreatic tumors with multiphasic helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004; 182:619.;
[6]
Hruban RH, Takaori K , Klimstra DS , Adsay NV , Albores-Saavedra J , Biankin AV , Biankin SA, Compton C, Fukushima N, Furukawa T, Goggins M, Kato Y, Klöppel G, Longnecker DS, Lüttges J, Maitra A , Offerhaus GJ , Shimizu M , Yonezawa S . An illustrated consensus on the classification of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms. Am J Surg Pathol 2004; 28:977;
[7]
Ries LAG, Young JL, Keel GE, Eisner MP, Lin YD, Horner M -J. SEER Survival Monograph: Cancer Survival Among Adults: U. S. SEER Program, 1988 -2001, Patient and Tumor Char acteristics. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, 2007. NIH Pub. No. 07-6215;
[8]
Sohal DP, Mangu PB , Khorana AA , Shah MA , Philip PA , O'Reilly EM , Uronis HE , Ramanathan RK, Crane CH , Engebretson A , Ruggiero JT , Copur MS , Lau M , Urba S , Laheru D . Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: American Society of Clinical On cology Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Oncol 2016; 34:2784.