Research Articles Supplement 2 · 2017 · pp. 165–169 · Issue page

CAN WE BUILD A BRIDGE BETWEEN PHILOSOPHY AND ENGINEERING

OV
1 Associate Professor, University POLITEHNICA of Bucharest, ROMANIA
Accepted 28 March 2026
Available Online 15 September 2017
IF PHILOSOPHY AND ENGINEERING ARE REGARDED AS (APPARENTLY) INCOMMENSURABLE PARADIGMS WE CAN MAKE THEM COMPATIBLE BY ANALYZING THEIR BASIC ASSUMPTIONS MADE IN DIFFERENT THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL CONTEXTS. AND THUS, THE BUILDING OF OUR BRIDGE DEPENDS ON HOW WE SEE THE WORLD, AS AN UNIVERSAL OR A FRAGMENTED ONE? THE CENTRAL CLAIM OF THIS PRESENTATION IS THAT BY ADOPTING THE PRINCIPLE OF A “THIN UNIVERSALISM” WE CAN CREATE A COMMON GROUND FOR PHILOSOPHERS AND ENGINEERS TO SUSTAIN COHERENTLY THEIR ARGUMENTS. AND THUS THE BUILDING OF A THEORETICAL BRIDGE WOULD INVOLVE THE EXERCISE OF OUR PRACTICAL REASON BY WHICH WE GAIN COMMON SENSE AND REASONABILITY.
PARADIGM ASSUMPTIONS THIN UNIVERSALISM PRACTICAL REASON
The body of this article is intentionally hidden on the public page. Please use the PDF reader or the PDF download for the complete text.
[1]
Clifford GEERTZ , “The World in Pieces: Culture and Politics at the End of the Century”, in his Available Light: Anthropological Reflections on Philosophical Topics Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2000, pp. 218-63
[2]
Armin GRUNWALD , “Against Over -estimating the Role of Ethics in Technology Development”, Science and Engineering Ethics, 6 (2), 2000, 181-196.
[3]
Bruce HADDOCK & Peter SUTCH, Multiculturalism, Identity and Rights, London and New York, Routledge, 2003.
[4]
Thomas KUHN , The structure of scientific revolutions, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press,
[5]
Carl MITHCHAM, ‘The Importance of Philosophy to Engineering’, Teorema, vol. XVII/3, 1998, 31 - 32.
[6]
*** http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2008/04/17/article-1015690-00F34D7100000578-713_468x540.jpg