Research Articles Issue 1 · 2022 · pp. 149–154 · Issue page

LOCAL FOREIGN BODY RESPONSE TO ORTHOPAEDIC BIOMATERIAL IMPLANTS

NI
RA
MA
AL
1 MD, Clinical Emergency Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
2 Assoc. Prof. PhD. Clinical Emergency Hospital, Bucharest, Romania ; “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
3 MD, Clinical Emergency Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
4 Assist. Prof. , Clinical Emergency Hospital, Bu charest, Romania ; “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
Received 04 January 2022
Revised 22 February 2022
Accepted 02 March 2022
Available Online 15 March 2022
THE SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF BONE LESIONS OFTEN INVOLVES IMPLANTATION OF SURGICAL DEVICES SUCH AS JOINT PROSTHESIS, PLATES, NAILS AND / OR SCREWS IN ORDER TO TREAT DEGENERATIVE PATHOLOGIES OR POSTTRAUMATIC LESIONS. IN MOST CASES THE SURGICAL TREATMENT IS A SUCCESS WHEN BONE HEALING OR PAIN MANAGEMENT IS ACHIEVED, BUT IN SOME CASES THE INFLA MMATORY RESPONSE SECONDARY TO BIOMATERIALS IMPLANTATION CAN LEAD TO CHRONIC PAIN, FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENT AND LOCAL INFECTION. THESE LOCAL COMPLICATIONS CAN HAVE IMPORTANT SIDE EFFECTS, SOMETIMES THE ONLY REMEDY BEING THE EXTRACTION OF THE BIOMATERIAL. OF COURSE, IF BONE HEALING IS ACHIEVED THE EXTRACTION OF THE BIOMATERIAL IS NOT A BIG PROBLEM BUT, IN SOME CASES, THE LOCAL INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE AND CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS CAN REQUIRE EARLY SURGICAL MANAGEME NT WITH THE EXTRACTION OF THE DEVICE; IN THESE CAS ES, SURGICAL MANAGEMENT WITH FURTHER OSTEOSYNTHESIS TECHNIQUES IS NECESSARY, WITH A GREAT IMPACT IN THE SOCIAL REINTEGRATION OF THE PATIENT BY PROLONGED INFIRMITY. IN THE PRESENT STUDY WE TRIED TO FIND THE MAIN CHARACTERISTICS THAN CAN LEAD TO INCREASED LOCAL INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE TO BIOMATERIALS IN ORDER TO LIMIT THE NEED FOR SURGICAL REINTERVENTIONS..
BIOMATERIALS FOREIGN BODY RESPONSE INFECTION OSTEITIS
The body of this article is intentionally hidden on the public page. Please use the PDF reader or the PDF download for the complete text.
[1]
Anderson JM, Rodriguez A, Chang DT . Foreign body reaction to biomaterials. Semin Immunol. 2008;20(2):86-100.
[2]
Gretzer C, Emanuelsson L, Liljensten E, Thomsen P. The inflammatory cell influx and cytokines changes during transition from acute inflammation to fibrous repair around implanted ma terials. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2006;17(6):669-87.
[3]
Luttikhuizen DT, Harmsen MC, Van Luyn MJ. Cellular and molecular dynamics in the foreign body reaction. Tissue Eng. 2006;12(7):1955-70.
[4]
Klopfleisch R, Jung F. The pathology of the foreign body reaction a gainst biomaterials. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2017;105(3):927-40.
[5]
Braune S, Grunze M, St raub A, Jung F. Are there sufficient standards for the in vitro hemocompatibility testing of biomaterials? Biointerphases. 2013;8(1):33.
[6]
Nilsson B, Ekdahl KN, Mollnes TE, Lambris JD. The role of complement in biomaterial -induced inflammation. Mol Immunol. 2007;44(1-3):82-94.
[7]
Love RJ, Jones KS. The recognition of biomaterials: pattern recognition of medical polymers and their adsorbed biomolecules. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2013;101(9):2740-52.