Research Articles Issue 2 · 2022 · pp. 71–79 · Issue page

ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE: WHAT YOUNG CITIZENS THINK? AN ANALISYS OF CONCERNS PRODUCED BY SURVEILLANCE

AN
RA
1 MA Student, Univeristy of Bucharest, Romania
2 Teaching Assistant, Babeș-Bolyai University, Romania
Corresponding author: [email protected]
Received 14 September 2022
Revised 29 October 2022
Accepted 14 November 2022
Available Online 15 November 2022
IN THE LAST DECADE MANY INTELLIGENCE SERVICES INTEGRATED TECHNOLOGY IN THEIR DAY- TO-DAY WORK WHILE THE CIT IZEN THAT NEEDS TO BE PROTECTED USES TECHNOLOGY IN ALMOST EVERY ASPECT OF THEIR LIFE . SURVEILLANCE AND ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE HAVE BECOME A SUBJECT OF GREAT INTEREST FOR CITIZENS OR OTHER NON -GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS BECAUSE OF MEDIA ATTENTION. MUCH SCHOLARLY ATTENTION IS PAID TO THE WAY INTELLIGENCE SERVICES ARE USING TECHNOLOGY TO PERFOR M THIS ACTIVITY OR THE INTRUSIVE CHARACTER OF THIS PHENOMENON . HOWEVER, WE KNOW VERY LITTLE ABOUT WHAT HAPPENS AT CITIZENS’ END, HOW CITIZENS PERCEIVE THIS ACTIVITY. THIS PAPER ADDRESSES THIS GAP IN LITERATURE AND ANALYZES WHAT ARE YOUNG CITIZENS LEGAL CONCERNS ABOUT ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE. THE STUDY USES ROMANIA AS A SINGLE - CASE STUDY AND SEMI -STRUCTURED INTERVIEWS CONDUCTED IN MARCH – APRIL 2022 WITH YOUNG CITIZENS OF DIFFERENT SOCIO -DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE. THE PAPER SEEKS TO UNDERSTAND WHAT ARE THE MAIN FEA RS RELATED TO THE LEGAL ASPECTS OF THIS PHENOMENON, MORE EXACTLY THE RIGHTS THAT YOUNG CITIZENS SEE AS VIOLATED.
SURVEILLANCE PUBLIC PERCEPTION ROMANIA LEGAL ASPECTS
The body of this article is intentionally hidden on the public page. Please use the PDF reader or the PDF download for the complete text.
[2004]
: 7–21. 4. “Recommendation CM/Rec(2014)4 of the Commi ttee of Ministers to Member States on Electronic Monitoring,” no. 5
[2014]
. 5. Robertson, K G . “Intelligence, Terrorism and Civil Liberties. ” Journal of Conflict Studies 7, no. 2
[1987]
: 43–62. 6. Ünver, H Ak ın. “Politics of Digital Sur veillance , National Secur ity and Privacy. ” EDAM Cyber Governance and Digital Democracy 2018/2, no. April
[2018]
: 23. 7. Wang, Victoria, and John V. Tucker. “Surveillance and Identity: Conceptual Framework and Formal Models.” Journal of Cybersecurity 3, no. 3
[2017]
: 145–158. 8. Watt, Eliza . “‘The Right to Privacy and the Future of Mass Surveillance. ’” International Journal of Human Rights 21, no. 7
[2017]
: 773–799. h 9. Wegge, Njord . “Intelligence Oversight and the Security of the State .” International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence 30, no. 4
[2017]
: 687–700. 10. Wood, David Murakami, Charles Raab, Nicola Green, and Jason Pridmore . “A Report on the Surveillance Society. ” Polity 70, no. September
[2006]
: 102. http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/data_protection/practical_application/surveillance_so ciety_full_report_2006.pdf. Annex 1 Overview of respondents Interview Name Sex Age County I1 C.A.V M 23 Cluj I2 A.A.I M 22 Hunedoara I3 S.M.I M 22 Hunedoara I4 A.L.S F 21 Bacău I5 B.A.Ș F 21 Bacău I6 I.P M 24 Suceava I7 I.C M 26 Bacău I8 F.R.A M 20 Bacău I9 H.R M 24 Bacău I10 S.M.R M 24 Bacău I11 H.K F 26 Timișoara I12 M.C.A M 21 Cluj I13 B.O.I F 23 Cluj I14 B.M.M F 21 Neamț I15 V.A.F M 21 Hunedoara I16 B.L.G F 23 Hunedoara I17 M.C.A F 22 Vâlcea I18 M.E F 22 Suceava I19 V.M.E F 22 Neamț I20 L.R.C F 32 Cluj