THE MECHANISM OF REGIONAL – GLOBAL SECURITY
Accepted
25 March 2026
Available Online
15 July 2013
Abstract
THE INTERNATIONAL SECURITY ENVIRONMENT IS IN A STABLE STATE ALTHOUGH THIS DOES NOT PRECLUDE THE POSSIBILITY OF SPECTACULAR CHANGES IN THE BALANCE OF POWER AND INTEREST CENTRES. THUS, IT IS BECOMING OBVIOUS THE SHIFT OF FOCUS FROM THE TRANSATLANTIC SPACE TO WARDS THE PACIFIC ZONE. IN ORDER TO UNDERSTAND TODAY’S TRENDS IT IS NECESSARY TO PROCEED TO A DIACHRONISTIC INTERPRETATION, NAMELY TO START WITH THE INCIPIENT STRUCTURING FORMS OF THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM. SECURITY IS BOTH A STATE OF THINGS AND A MECHANISM THIS FACT COMPLETING FLEXIBILITY IN CONCEPTS BUT MOSTLY IN THE STEPS TO TAKE TOWARDS IMPROVING THE REFERENCE BACKGROUND AND IN KEEPING CONTROL UPON CONFLICT CENTRES, RISKS OR THREATS. THE SHIFT OF THE WORLD GRAVITY CENTRE TOWARDS THE PACIFIC, AS WELL AS THE CHANGE FROM UNILATERALISM TO MULTI -POLARIZATION ALONG WITH THE CRISES IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF EURO ATLANTIC SPACE MAY BE UNDERSTOOD AS INVITATIONS TO A MECHANISM OF REGIONAL -GLOBAL SECURITY, AS IT IS DEFINED AND ACCEPTED BY THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY.
Keywords
SECURITY ENVIRONMENT
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS
SECURITY
Full Text
The body of this article is intentionally hidden on the public page. Please use the PDF reader or the PDF download for the complete text.
References
[1795]
1970) “Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Stretch‟, in Hans Reiss (ed.), Kant’s Political Writings”. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 19. Kelman, Herbert (1997) “Social -psychological Dimensions of International Conflict”, in I. William Zartman and J. Lewis Rasmussen (eds.), Peacemaking in International Conflict: Methods and Techniques. Washington, DC: US Institute of Peace. Pp. 191-237. 20. Kelman, H.C. Cohen, S.P . (1979) Reduction of International Conflict: An International Approach‟, in W. G. Austin and S. Worchel (eds.), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Belmont: Wadsworth. Pp. 288-303. 21. Kleiboer, Marieke (1996) “Understanding Success and Failure of International Mediation”, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 40 (2): 360-89. July 2013 22. Kleiboer, Marieke (1996) The Multiple Realities of International Mediation. Boulder: Lynne Reinner. 23. Kreps, David (1990) Game Theory and Economic Modelling. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 24. Kriesberg, Louis (1998) “The Phases of Destructive Conflicts”, in David Carment and Patrick James (eds.), Peace in the Midst of war: Preventing and Managing International Ethnic Conflict s. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press. Pp. 33-60. 25. Kugler, Jacek and Lemke, Douglas (2000) “The Power Transition”, in Manus Midlarsky (ed.) Handbook of War Studies, 2nd edn. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. 26. Tetlock, Philip (1998) “Social Psychology and World Politics”, in D. Gilbert, S. Fiske and G. Lindzey (eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology, vol. 2, 4 th edn. New York: McGraw-Hill. Pp. 868-914. 27. Touval, Saadia (1992) “The Superpowers as Mediators”, in Jacob Bercovitch and Jeffrey Z. Rubin (eds.), Mediation in International Relations: Multiple Approaches to Conflict Management. New York: St. Martin‟s Press. Pp. 232-48. 28. Touval, Saadia (1994) “Why the UN Fails”, Foreign Affairs, 73 (5): 44-57. 29. Zartman, I. William (1985) Ripe for Resoluti on: Conflict and Intervention in Africa. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 30. Zartman, I. William (1999) “Dynamics and Constrains in Negotiations in Internal Conflicts”, in I. William Zartman (ed.), Elusive Peace: Negotiating an End to Civil Wars. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution. Pp. 3-29.