Research Articles Issue 1 · 2015 · pp. 119–124 · Issue page

THE IMPORTANCE AND UTILITY OF THE „PRELIMINARY RULING” PROCEDURE OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

IU
1 Postdoctoral scholar, “Acad. Andrei Rădulescu” Legal Research Institute of Romanian Academy; Lecturer PhD, Faculty of Law and Administrative Sciences, University of Pitesti.
Accepted 27 March 2026
Available Online 15 March 2015
THE COURTS OF THE 28 MEMBER STATES MAY INTERPRET AND APPLY THE EUROPEAN LEGISLATION IN DIFFERENT WAYS, WHICH COULD “IRREMEDIABLY COMPROMISE THE FULFILMENT OF THE EUROPEAN UNION’S OBJECTIVES”2. FOR THE INTERPRETATION OF THE UNION’S LAW TO NOT BE LEFT SOLELY TO THE DISCRETION OF THE NATIONAL COURTS, THIS ARTIC LE AIMS TO REVEAL THE IMPORTANCE OF THE PRELIMINARY RULING PROCEDURE, BASED ON WHICH THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION HAS THE COMPETENCE TO JUDGE WITH A PRELIMINARY TITLE, ACCORDING TO ART 19 PARA 3 LET B) OF THE TEU CORROBORATED WITH ART 267 OF THE TFEU, AT THE REQUEST OF THE NATIONAL COURTS, REGARDING THE INTERPRETATION OF THE EUROPEAN UNION’S LAW OR THE VALIDITY OF THE ACTS ADOPTED BY THESE INSTITUTIONS. THIS IS WHY THIS MECHANISM HAS THE ROLE TO PREVENT A DIVERGENT JURISPRUDENCE WITHIN THE UNION USING THE “PRELIMINARY RULING PROCEDURE” BY THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION.
UNITARY INTERPRETATION AND APPLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN LAW
The body of this article is intentionally hidden on the public page. Please use the PDF reader or the PDF download for the complete text.
[1]
Craig, Paul and De Burca, Grainne . Dreptul Uniunii Europene”. 4th Edition, Bucharest: Haman giu,
[2]
Duţu, Mircea and Duţu, Andrei . Dreptul contenciosului European. Bucharest: Universul Juridic,
[3]
Fabian, Gyula. Drept instituţional al Uniunii Europene. Bucharest: Hamangiu, 2012
[4]
Vladilă, Lavinia -Mihaela and Matusescu, Constanta and Ionescu, Steluta . Jurisdicţii Internaţionale şi Europene. Bucharest: ProUniveristaria, 2014
[5]
Guinchard, Serge and Ferrand, Frédérique. Procedure civile, Droit interne et droit communautaire. Paris: Dalloz, 2006 Chapter or other part of book
[6]
Pescatore, Pierre . “Le renvoi prejudiciel: l’evolution du systeme”, Etude de droit communautaire europeen 1962 -2007 (Collection de l’Union Europeene), dirigee par Picod, F.; Bruxelles: Bruyllant, Articles in a print journal
[7]
Deleanu, Ion . “Dialogul judecătorilor – forme şi implicaţii ale dialo gului judecătorilor. Revista Română de jurisprudenţă 1 (2012): 17-44
[8]
Tănăsescu, Simina E . “Trimiterea preliminară şi cooperarea judiciară loială ». Revista Română de Drept European 3 (2012): 32-41 Website
[9]
http://www.juridice.ro/267796/procedura-hotararii-preliminare-la-cjue-si-jurisprudenta-instantelor- romane-sinteza.html, accessed on June 25, 2014